|
|
The discrete method (also known as the classes or sectional method) was developed by Hounslow [ 10], Litster [ 16], and Ramkrishna [ 25]. It is based on representing the continuous particle size distribution (PSD) in terms of a set of discrete size classes or bins, as illustrated in Figure 2.3.1. The advantages of this method are its robust numerics and that it gives the PSD directly. The disadvantages are that the bins must be defined a priori and that a large number of classes may be required.
Numerical Method
In
ANSYS FLUENT, the PBE is written in terms of volume fraction of particle size
:
where
is the density of the secondary phase and
is the volume fraction of particle size
, defined as
|
|
(2.3-2) |
where
|
|
(2.3-3) |
and
is the volume of the particle size
. In
ANSYS FLUENT, a fraction of
, called
, is introduced as the solution variable. This fraction is defined as
where
is the total volume fraction of the secondary phase.
The nucleation rate
appears in the discretized equation for the volume fraction of the smallest size
. The notation
signifies that this particular term, in this case
, appears in Equation
2.3-1 only in the case of the smallest particle size.
The growth rate in Equation 2.3-1 is discretized as follows [ 10]:
|
|
(2.3-5) |
The volume coordinate is discretized as [
10]
where
and is referred to as the "ratio factor''.
The particle birth and death rates are defined as follows:
|
|
|
![]() |
(2.3-6) |
|
|
|
![]() |
(2.3-7) |
|
|
|
![]() |
(2.3-8) |
|
|
|
|
(2.3-9) |
where
and
![]() |
(2.3-10) |
is the particle volume resulting from the aggregation of particles
and
, and is defined as
|
|
(2.3-11) |
where
|
|
(2.3-12) |
If
is greater than or equal to the largest particle size
, then the contribution to class
is
|
|
(2.3-13) |
|
|
Note that there is no breakage for the smallest particle class.
|
Breakage Formulations for the Discrete Method
The default breakage formulation for the discrete method in
ANSYS FLUENT is based on the Hagesather method [
14]. In this method, the breakage sources are distributed to the respective size bins, preserving mass and number density. For the case when the ratio between successive bin sizes can be expressed as
where
, the source in bin
, (
) can be expressed as
![]() |
(2.3-14) |
Here
|
|
(2.3-15) |
A more mathematically rigourous formulation is given by Ramakrishna [ 13], where the breakage rate is expressed as
![]() |
(2.3-16) |
where
|
|
(2.3-17) |
The Ramakrishna formulation can be slow due to the large number of integration points required. However, for simple forms of
, the integrations can be performed relatively easily. The Hagesather formulation requires fewer integration points and the difference in accuracy with the Ramakrishna formulation can be corrected by a suitable choice of bin sizes.
|
|
To keep the computing time reasonable, a volume averaged value is used for the turbulent eddy dissipation when the Luo model is used in conjunction with the Ramakrishna formulation.
|